Cocaine-fuelled Mercedes driver, 43, who killed himself and two teenage passengers in three-car horror smash was FIFTEEN times over the limit

Posted on

A driver who kicked the bucket close by his two high school travelers in an awful auto accident was 15 times over the medication driving breaking point.

Andrew James Clark was in the driver’s seat of a Mercedes which crashed into a lorry in Whickham, close Newcastle upon Tyne, on August 10 a year ago.

His travelers Jennifer Fradgley and Kaitlin Tremlett, both 17, passed on close by Mr Clark. Every one of the three endured serious numerous wounds.

An investigation heard that Mr Clark, 43, from Swalwell, had lost his mom the day preceding the crash.

She had been sick for quite a while however her condition weakened quickly in the weeks prior to her passing.

The examination heard how the youngsters, who were companions of Mr Clark, had gone to his home to offer their sympathies.

Around 2.20am he utilized his companion’s Mercedes which he was not safeguarded on to drop the young ladies home.

The pathologist who done an after death examination said there was confirmation of cocaine, cannabis and diazepam in Mr Clark’s framework and a low level of liquor.

As indicated by examining officers, the level of medications in his circulation system was 756ng – meaning he was 15 times over the lawful medication driving farthest point of 50ng.

There was no confirmation showing when or where he may have taken the medications.

Mishap examiners said the vehicle would have been going over the 50mph speed constrain and the medications in his framework would have disabled his capacities.

The examination was informed that, had Mr Clark survived the crash, he would have been arraigned for causing demise by perilous driving after the young ladies’ passing.

Coroner Terence Carney presumed that Jennifer and Kaitlin, both from Gateshead, were unlawfully executed.

What’s more, he decided that Mr Clark kicked the bucket because of wounds supported in a street car accident.

He included: ‘On this specific night, I’m fulfilled no one made a special effort to cause hurt.

‘Kaitlin and Jennifer, did not distinguish any feeling of peril. They appear to have been attracted to a companion in need to offer him some sympathy and some solace despite his misfortune.’

Mr Carney intensely condemned the proprietor of the Mercedes, Richard Dunham, 42, of Whitley Straight, who not long ago was sentenced two numbers of permitting utilization of his auto by somebody without protection.

The main charge, which he conceded in court, identified with an adventure produced using Hexham to Swalwell on the day preceding the crash, when Mr Clark was permitted to drive the Mercedes and Dunham was a traveler.

Dunham guaranteed he didn’t know his companion was uninsured.

The second charge, which he denied however was discovered blameworthy of after trial, was in association with the deadly crash on Fellside Street.

The investigation heard Dunham, an executive of an auto organization, had been with MrClark on the night of August 9.

He said he didn’t see either Mr Clark or the young ladies drinking when they were at his home, and guaranteed that around 3.30am, he found the trio had gone and his auto was absent.

However cops said Dunham had let them know: ‘I about got in the auto with them, I shouldn’t have given him the keys. Those poor young ladies.’

Be that as it may, Dunham guaranteed he didn’t give his companion consent to take his auto and said he had gone to bed with the auto keys under his pad and proposed Mr Clark had taken them without his insight.

As the coroner gave his decision to the court, he stated: ‘Obviously [Dunham] enabled Andrew to utilize this vehicle when he was uninsured.

‘On the off chance that he had not allowed that, this occurrence would not have happened.

‘What I find unforgivable is that in the midst of the anguish and distress of these families, affront has been added to damage by him not telling all the more, but rather more distinctly, to the family that is basic to this case.

‘I don’t acknowledge or trust an expression of what he has addressed me today.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *